From b87eb3f8feb826ac48463f598fc10476055bee5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:31:59 -0500
Subject: Use SCANF_ISOC99_A instead of _IO_FLAGS2_SCANF_STD.

Change the callers of __vfscanf_internal and __vfwscanf_internal that
want C99-compliant behavior to communicate this via the new flags
argument, rather than setting bits on the FILE object.  This also
means these functions do not need to do their own locking.

Tested for powerpc and powerpc64le.
---
 libio/libio.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'libio/libio.h')

diff --git a/libio/libio.h b/libio/libio.h
index d4eba2df54..30cb7d784f 100644
--- a/libio/libio.h
+++ b/libio/libio.h
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ typedef union
 #define _IO_FLAGS2_NOTCANCEL 2
 #define _IO_FLAGS2_FORTIFY 4
 #define _IO_FLAGS2_USER_WBUF 8
-#define _IO_FLAGS2_SCANF_STD 16
 #define _IO_FLAGS2_NOCLOSE 32
 #define _IO_FLAGS2_CLOEXEC 64
 #define _IO_FLAGS2_NEED_LOCK 128
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-65-gdbad