| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The typo in 54c7ad6dde83e741d65b055aefa2ae4067928054 pretty
much justifies this (i.e. don't choose a complicated
solution when a simple one will do), as the previous
thing never worked.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: 0a342ee2536a73c3c45f6bebf0cb0e0692a637c8
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/867700
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: 0a342ee2536a73c3c45f6bebf0cb0e0692a637c8
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nothing in Gentoo needs this and it's a waste of resources.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests passed on real hardware.
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests passed on real hardware.
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests passed on real hardware.
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to how it was fixed for lua 5.3
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/739764
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/24359
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3
Signed-off-by: Alexey Sokolov <alexey+gentoo@asokolov.org>
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Cross-compile fix, use libtol on the target system and move libtool to
DEPEND instead of BDEPEND.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/515554
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/739764
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/24018
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3
Signed-off-by: Alexandra Parker <alex.iris.parker@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831053
Closes: #24027
Signed-off-by: Ahmed Charles <me@ahmedcharles.com>
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The tests pass.
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The tests pass.
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/552720
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/798693
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Certain string.format operations produce clearly wrong results, for
instance "string.format("%d", 2^63)" gives -9223372036854775808 on
amd64 yet 9223372036854775807 on riscv; This is the same as with 5.2 but
unlike the latter, it doesn't trigger a test failure here due to
much smaller test coverage of 5.1. However:
- an upstream mailing-list discussion from 2011 [1] suggests
string.format("%d") is known to be borked in Lua 5.1 for very large
integers;
- this is unlikely to have an effect on arithmetics because Lua numbers
are floating-point (string formatting this is one of the few places
in the interpreter where they get internally converted to integers)
Not to mention that this doesn't work correctly on several other arches
for which lua:5.1 has already not only been keyworded but actually
stabilised.
[1] http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2011-07/msg00876.html
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Certain string.format operations produce clearly wrong results, for
instance "string.format("%d", 2^63)" gives -9223372036854775808 on
amd64 yet 9223372036854775807 on riscv. This is the same as with 5.2 but
unlike the latter, it doesn't trigger a test failure here due to
much smaller test coverage of 5.1.
This might be a formatting-only problem because the binary representation
of 2^63 looks the same (and OK) on both arches, not to mention that for
newer Lua versions 2^63 is already considered out of range for '%d'
- but err on the side of caution for now.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fails tests for all combinations of USE flags.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14-prefix, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|