blob: 2e718da2c5070048f0c64ba1b5aefcde237e8a27 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
# Copyright 1999-2020 Gentoo Authors
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
EAPI=7
# At some point URW++ released fonts under GPL license. After that they were took
# and improved by Valek Filippov and this work was somehow related with AFPL...
# At least it can be found on their svn server:
# http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/trunk/urw-fonts/
# Also, some time ago, sources where published on sf.net:
# https://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/files/
# At this point this package was published on a nuber of other sites
# (gimp.org/cups.org) and media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std was added to the tree.
# But nobody use that old releases any mover and everybody syncs with
# svn.ghostscript.com. The most recent tag there is:
# http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/
# But note that version we have is different from upstream tag. This happened
# because we started to use redhat versions and followed their versioning. It's
# hard to say why they use such strange version since they also sync with
# svn.ghostscript.com. Redhat's ChangeLog states:
# Tue Jan 8 23:00:00 2008 Than Ngo 2.4-2
# - update to 1.0.7pre44
inherit estack rpm font
MY_PV=$(ver_rs 2 -)
DESCRIPTION="free good quality fonts gpl'd by URW++"
HOMEPAGE="http://www.urwpp.de/"
SRC_URI="mirror://gentoo/${PN}-${MY_PV}.fc13.src.rpm"
LICENSE="GPL-2"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ~ia64 m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 s390 sparc x86 ~x64-cygwin ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~m68k-mint ~sparc-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris"
RDEPEND="
!media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std
!media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-other"
S="${WORKDIR}"
DOCS="ChangeLog README*"
FONT_S="${S}"
FONT_SUFFIX="afm pfb pfm"
pkg_postinst() {
font_pkg_postinst
elog "If you upgraded from ${PN}-2.1-r2 some fonts will look a bit"
elog "different. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
}
|
GitWeb
